The money

Can you name the main point of each system? It is similar; the main purpose of every system is to win more money of course. Even if you think you can win a lot with the book-makers you are wrong: you can win much more. But think carefully: do the book-makers bring you much money?

No, of course. I’m sure you are happy when you even get the sum you’ve bet back! If you hear about the profit 10-20% from the bet sum,you have to know that such a result only a professional can reach. The balance of the biggest part of the gamble is lower that the zero –there is nothing well. And here is the profit you get using our system: everything depends on the gambler’s qualifications and knowledge.

The worse he plays, the more income he has. One player has a sum N. if he uses this sum for betting, he will definitely lose it. Of course in some cases he can win something but it’s a rare case. And in that rare case this system won’t be efficient for him. The best category of the players (of this strategy I mean) is the only beginners. Isn’t it nice to know that you weren’t wrong and the team on which you wanted to bet loses the game (such thing are happened VERY often).

The time

I’m sure that to bet well you need to spend a lot time to gather information and so on. Maybe for the people who has the Internet it’s not so difficult, but the information itself isn’t valuable at all. You need to sort it, select everything you need, and this usually requires much time. But not everyone can bet a good gambler even if he has all the data.

At the book-maker’s you need to think about the results, analyze a lot. What I mean is that if you want to see results playing with the book-maker, you have to spend a lot of time. My system offers you to win not losing your valuable time. Really important is to feel the boarder: you have to play at the book-maker’s to get some experience of course.

And the results, I mean good results require some efforts too: looking after the latest news, betting together with the intuition, not from the statistic data.

The risks

There is no risk, playing this way, even a child understands.

The general result

All the readers are now interested what is the sense to play such way, if you cannot get the real money?
It’s a very clever question, but think carefully – if you don’t win it means you don’t lose! This system is the most important for those new gamblers who want to get really important thing – the experience.

I don’t think it’s a good way to start betting with the real money. The new player can usually play with the emotions a lot, and I’m sure it can’t bring any success. The conclusion is that it’s more practically to play conditionally at first. But when you can already lead your intuition, knowledge and emotions you can bet in the real world.

This system also helps to develop your intuition, because you’ll bet more with its help. This system doesn’t require any money and information, and the last point can often make you very bored. A developed intuition – it is one of the main features the player should have. That’s why try to check it well first.

And one more thing, even if you are an experienced gambler you can use the system, to try playing with the new strategy or something like that.

To play slots is not necessarily going to be the one-way ticket to easy street, but if the player is going to play slots, he or she should do it right. Here you find a few slot games strategy tips to employ when enjoying the slots.

Slot Strategy 1: Play the Maximum

Nowadays most free online slots are not just one coin, centerline machines. In modern online slots, you can insert multiple coins on every spin. These coins can serve different aims. Some increase the amount you are paid back on a winning spin, while others add extra lines which you can be paid for. Anyway, the more coins you play, the more you can win. Moreover, playing the max number of coins will qualify you for any progressive jackpot, a big prize for getting a rare combination which can exceed the true odds of hitting it.

Slot Strategy 2: Payback

The majority of casino games are played according to the odds. The Casino has calculated already that they have a specific advantage in each game. For instance, they might know they will win 1 dollar for every 100 dollars that have been wagered on the Banker in Baccarat on average.

Similarly, slot games are set to pay back a certain percentage of the money they take in. A 99 % payback machine pays back 99 dollars out of every 100 dollars it takes in, while an 85 % payback machine would only pay back 85 dollars out of every 100 dollars. It is obvious which one you would prefer to play. When you are playing online, try to find out the payback of the slot machines, and just play the more favorable ones.

Slot Strategy 3: Ignore “Cold” and “Hot”

Apart from the stated payback of the slot, there is not any reason a machine should be more “cold” or “hot” than any other. A slot machine that has just paid out has got the same percentage chance of paying out on the next spin as it always has done. A slot machine that has gone a lot of spins without a payoff is no more “due” on the next spin than any other slot machine with the same payback setting.

The coefficient, fitting to the given event, where we’ll use the strategy shouldn’t be very high: the main is that the criterion was made, and if it is for the coefficient 1.50 it means you can bet on this event. But the bigger is the coefficient, the bigger influence makes the error of the determining of the credibility of the event.

To say truthfully for the coefficient 5.0 the relative error in the determining of the mark 10% gives the absolute mistake not less than 0.0200 (because concerning with the criterion, the credibility for the value betting with the given coefficient can’t be 0.20 and for the coefficient 1.50 this relative mistake gives the absolute not less than 0.0667, it means in the 3.3333 times more (the same the relation of the coefficients give).

We can say with the sureness that the coefficients that are less than 2.0 practically never suit the value betting: the book-makers usually never make the higher coefficients lower (such coefficients are usually given on the winning of the favorite and they are usually lower). But the high coefficients suit very often. In the other words the game against the favorite is the real value betting.

The second task after the determining of the objects of the value betting is the determining of the stakes’ sizes.

The best idea here can be using of the fixed size of the stake (for example 10$ on each suiting for the criterion event). But if you are sure that you can determine the marks of the credibility of the result very exactly, you can use the Kelly Criterion, you only have to take the percent not from the present, but from the first bank. In this case it’s better not to value the credibility, than value more. The progressive financial strategies here can be used in the system of the “going after” with rather big coefficients (when the sum of the stake increases a little with the increasing of the number of the iterations).

Remember that the betting value is the system optimized for the long-time game, it means that in the most of the cases you won’t get quick income. And if you value the credibility of the events wrongly, if you value them so wrong that you often choose the events which completely don’t suit (it is pity but you can check only having done 500 stakes and having looked the balance) your game leads to the crash. That’s why you’d better try a little on a shit of paper and then only with real money.

Theoretically everything is very simple: you try to compare your degree of the credibility of the event with the book-maker’s coefficient. And if you see that comparing with your mark the book-maker’s is higher, it means he undervalued the event, the object for the Value Betting (named the Value) is found!

Mathematically the checking if this event is the value can be checked with this formula:
K*P>1
Where K – it’s the book-maker’s coefficient, and the P – it’s your mark usually the number from 0 to 1.

Let’s examine everything on the example:

Let’s in the match Spartacus – the Soviet’s wings the coefficient on the winning of the guests 4.50. According to your mark from the four matches in the Moscow against the Spartacus – even one will be won while all the same conditions, that means you value the winning of the Samara’s team as 0.25. Let’s check: 4.50 х 0.25 = 1.125 > 1! So the bet on the winning of the Wings will be the betting in this case.

The conception of the Value Betting is different enough from other kind of the stakes.

Here, at first you shouldn’t think about the collection of the statistical data theoretically, about the enemies also, think about the last news about the teams and so on – it is simply mathematical game (here I can note, that of course to win something you need to value the teams’ chances, so you need to know something about them) which as a theory guarantees you a great profit while a long game.

For this you need only to value the possible results of the matches right. However, as we’ve already examined on this site the coefficients can’t give the real imagination about the positions and the strength, that’s why you can, and always will have a little difference in your marks.

And the second point is that you do not have to worry about the silliness of your stake, if it happens sometimes. One more example: the bet on that the next card which will be taken out of the deck will be ace clubs. The “usual” player wouldn’t like to bet on it, I think: too little chances.

But if you play Value Betting you should check the coefficients. And if you find out that the coefficient is 60, it is your value object. For real the credibility that the ace clubs would be taken out of the deck is 1/52= 0.0192. Let’s check: 60 х 0.0192 = 1.152 > 1! And if you do 1000 stakes on this event with the coefficients, accepted the criteria of the value betting you’ll get the profit.

Let’s examine this betting strategy with the care and attentiveness.

The classical “fork” – it’s the bet on one event but on the all the results of it. It means that if it is total – we bet both: more and less. If it is the tennis ball – we bet the loss and the win of the player.

And where is the winning? And the winning is that you have to bet at different offices, counting the difference of the coefficients. So the “forks” exist because different offices can predict different teams’ chances. Of course, not every match has the “forks”, but usually you can find them.

Everything will be understandable after the examples:

The example 1

So the best coefficients on the 1X2 are at the offices Alpenland 1.90, Darwin 3.60, and Darwin 5.75. so to get !$ on the Roma’s winning you have to bet at the Alpenlan d0.53$ (1/1.90=0.53), then, on the draw game you have to bet at the Darwin 0.28$ (1/1.30=0.28), on the winning of the Lids we bet at the Darwin 0.17$ (1/5.75=0.17). so to get !$ we need to bet 0.53+ 0.28 + 0.17=0.98$. As you see we get the income independently from the result of the match. So from each bet 1$ we get 1/0.98=1.02$.

The example 2

In the first example we described the classical technique (1, X and 2). And now let’s examine the events, where there are two results: for example the tennis ball.

Having made the little counting we see that there is a “fork” at about 2.95%. By the way if the event has two results, we can check the existence of the “fork” with the help of the easy formula. If Coef1*Coef2>Coef1+Coef2, there is a “fork”.

So we see, that after betting the “forks” we have dot the guarantee winning.

BUT! The player, who bets the “forks”, has got some problems on his way. If you bet in the Internet, you have to have a lot of accounts at a lot of the book-makers, to be able to find the “fork”. So you’ve got the cost for the moving money on your account and getting the money from the account (you have to pay the percent while checking off the money with the bank system, and moneybookers system and also by the credit card).

So if we have after playing the “fork” 2%! and it’s a lot, while the moving money we can lose 1.5%. so we should think if we need it at all.

But if you bet at the real offices, not in the Internet, you can meet some difficulties too. The player has to be in time everywhere, where he wants to make a stake, at all the offices. And difficult because there are also other players, who want to bet the “fork”.

And you’ll ask:”How can my stakes be connected with this?!” and I’ll answer:”you can make you stakes in the system of the arithmetical progression”. I mean, for example, after your first bet your lottery should be 5$, after the second – 10$, after the third – 15$, and so on. So after each stake your winning is bigger in 5$. And what about the loss will you ask again?! And the thing is that there is no loss!!! There is no, because we’re playing the “going after” and in the best case we bet on the same event to play off our previous loss and win the sum, which you have to checking with the arithmetical progression.

This system can be described by a very easy mathematical formula:

The sum = (winning + loss)/ (coefficient-1)

The sum – is the sum of your bet on each round of the “going after” (let’s pretend N round)
The loss – your previous loss, means the loss for the N-1 round of your playing
The winning – is the winning, which you have to get on this round of the “going after”, it’s easy to count with the formula N*W, where N – the number of the “goings after”, the W – is the winning for an each round of the “going after”
Coefficient – is the coefficient on the event, which is gone after.

So what do we get while playing with this system?

We get the fact, that after each game of the team, which we’re “going after”, we have the certain and always similar sum of the money which we get all the time. It means, that if we “go after” the team on the total less (and only the “going after” the totals has sense), it doesn’t matter how many times the team will play more – 1 from 10 times, or 9 from 10 times, we’ll have our winning 50$ (f we want to get %$ for the match)anyway.

The only one problem is having enough money to put on the previous loss if the “going after” is long.

The best use of this strategy is using the “going after” of a few teams or even the whole championship.

Let’s pretend, we’re going after ten teams and for each team we have got 1$, it means that after the first day of the stakes we’ve got 10$ – really (if everything went on right) or potentially (if some teams didn’t play an you’ll have to “go after” them in the future).

If you choose the teams right, we’ll already have the reserve of the money for one team if the “going after” is long. In my opinion it’s one of the best systems to play the “going after”, which needs only enough money and giving not bad practical 100% winnings. But I’d like to tell you once more about the danger which exist while playing with the “going after”. If you get into the long event, which is opposite to that, which you’re “going after”, you can lose everything.

The matches of the team of the New Jersy (total – middle is 5) (beginning from the October).

It means we bet as on the more, and on the more too. Then we go after the lost stake.

How To Use This Sport Betting Method

The method, of course, is interesting, but the described by us above method about the double “going after” will bring much better results.

That’s why I decided to examine some other kinds of the “going after”, which are not so dangerous for the player. And now I’d like to tell you about one of them – the double “going after”.

So what is the double –“going after”??? The main sense is similar to all the “goings after”, but you bet not on the similar events all the time, but on the opposite events, changing them one after another. So, for example, you bet on the total less till you win, then you bet on the total more, till you win again and then again on the total less and so on.

So what are the advantages in this kind of the stakes?

At first, you can win more often, and the second point is that some features would be counted, which aren’t while the “going after” on one event, for example the present state of the team.

So if the team played well, on the total less, it means that the credibility, that it will play the next game with the same results is high, for example the team started to play in the defense more responsible. The same system is for the total more.

After analyzing the statistics, you can be sure that to “catch” the series MLMLMLMLM is much more difficult than, for example, MMMMMMMM or LLLLLLLL. That means that the risk of the financial crash decreases, but exists anyway.

To the other disadvantages I’d put the great depending on the choosing of the team.

Of course the “corridors” can exist not only in the basketball, but in all the kinds of the sport, where the book-maker giver the ability tom bet with the foras. For example, it’s not bad to use the “corridors” in football. Let’s pretend that the leader plays with the middle team of the league. The book-maker gives the coefficients 1.3 on the win of the leader and 1.5 the fora is (+1.5) for the middle team. If we’re doing the decision after the thoughts and the analysis, which mostly liked the leader will win with the difference in one ball, we get the typical “corridor”.

In the same way you can use the “corridors” in the hockey, baseball, tennis sport betting.

How To Use Basketball Betting System

It can really get some money if to use the foras in different offices.

For example the match Leikers – Finiks, and the office gives the fora -8+8 with the coefficient 1.85. So how does the gambler behave him? He bets three on Leikers (the coefficient 1.35) and +10 on Finiks (the coefficient is 1.7) and let’s pretend each with 100$.

It’s logically seemed that one of the stakes will play, so the gambler will take 135$ or 170$. But the stake is 200$! And where is the winning here?!

But the winning is in that moment: the result of the match should get into out corridor. In our example the corridor is -3…+10 (it means the corridor in eight points), that means that if Leikers wins from 3 to 10 points we’ll win the both stakes. The pure income will be 105%!

And in the case of not getting into the boundaries of the “corridor” the player doesn’t lose the whole sum, but only the part!

Of course you shouldn’t bet the equal sums.

In the example sowed above the foras of the one office were used, but there are a lot of the offices. In one the fora can be -5+5, and another can have -8+8 for the same match. So you can make the coefficient of each stake bigger or make bigger the size of the “corridor” and those things make the chances to win grow.